German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects
Files
Date
2015
Embargo
Authors
Advisor
Coadvisor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Light MIST Assotiation for Regional Development
Language
English
Alternative Title
Abstract
Large size infrastructure projects, such as airport, rail and road extensions, are
particularly likely to encounter frequent citizens´ protests. The experience with
the enhancements of the Stuttgart train station is an especially relevant example,
since it has motivated the economic stakeholders, as well as the German federal
and regional legislators and administrations, to rethink the project. In this case,
which has become known as “Stuttgart 21”, massive resistance only materialized
after the planning approval procedure. As a consequence, the "Law for broadening
the public participation and for the standardization of the procedures for
determining sectorial plans" was introduced in the German legislature in 2012.
Among other elements in this law, public participation is now required prior to
the formal opening of the procedure for planning and approval of sectorial plans,
as described in Article 25, paragraph 3, of the Administrative Procedure Code.
In 2013, the Association of German Engineers developed standards governing the
communication and public participation in planning and building infrastructure
projects. These standards are directed at project sponsors, general and specialist
design contractors, project managers, executing companies and their officials. In
the same year, regional governments produced binding administrative provisions
to intensify public participation in the planning and licensing procedures of large
infrastructure projects. These standards and administrative provisions establish
several mandatory steps and procedures within the regional planning and
approval processes: these mandatory steps include scoping the previous and
present participation of the public and their interaction, both at formal and
informal levels, conducting an official investigation to show just cause for the
project, establishing internet access to the project allowing for on‐line search of
the detailed plans by the public, a requirement to request and enable public
participation periodically as the planning process develops, and a need to re‐
evaluate these new rules as appropriate.
Similar rules have been introduced since the 1980’s by the European Union to
advance and implement environmental protection.
The main objective of these mandatory steps is a more efficient harmonization of
the different interests involved in spatial planning. In order to establish a more
solid foundation for a critical analysis of several of the elements in these rules, this
paper discusses the essential factors impacting these types of plans, the skills
required in their preparation, the strategies leading to acceptance of those plans,
and the possible dynamics affecting their implementation. Nevertheless, these
legal, administrative and private rules have come under some criticism, as listed
below:
‐ several basic aspects of these rules are not sufficiently focused on the
associated extra‐legal problems that they raise;
‐ some elements are voluntary rather than mandatory, while others are not
precisely defined so as not to scare away potential investors;
19
‐ while aiming at achieving more efficiency, several new obligations limit,
qualitatively as well as quantitatively, the holding of successive stages of
public participation, partly due to a clause that excludes the discussion of
public rights which have not been presented during prior public
participation;
‐ concerning environmental protection interests, the obligations of
evaluation and participation focus only on the processes themselves, but
do not aim at avoiding any resulting environmental harm.
Keywords
public participation, spatial planning, licensing procedure of infrastrucure projects
Document Type
conferenceObject
Publisher Version
Dataset
Citation
Identifiers
TID
Designation
Access Type
Open Access